Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Meagher County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 81
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $3,355,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Springdale Colony | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $371,159 |
| 2 | Townsend Ranch LLC | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $354,895 |
| 3 | Galt Ranch Lp | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $261,158 |
| 4 | Catlin Ranch Lp | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $229,002 |
| 5 | Lloyd Zumbrun Jr | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $170,225 |
| 6 | Camas Creek Cattle & Sheep Co | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $161,519 |
| 7 | J & L Livestock LLC | Billings, MT 59105 | $142,560 |
| 8 | Alkali Lake Farms Inc | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $130,907 |
| 9 | Tg Ranch Company | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $114,013 |
| 10 | Snowbank Ranch LLC | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $95,593 |
| 11 | Rose Cattle Company LLC | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $81,675 |
| 12 | Brewer Ranch LLC | Ringling, MT 59642 | $63,274 |
| 13 | Grande Ranch Co | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $57,695 |
| 14 | Matthew D Brewer | Ringling, MT 59642 | $53,421 |
| 15 | Ralph K Miller | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $52,108 |
| 16 | Keyhole Cattle Co | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $49,470 |
| 17 | Scott A Jackson | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $48,602 |
| 18 | Fort Logan Ranch LLC | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $45,749 |
| 19 | Montana Horse Company | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $43,813 |
| 20 | Lucas Ranch Inc | Ringling, MT 59642 | $43,359 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
