Total Disaster Programs in Meagher County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 203
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $15,283,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Brewer Ranch | Ringling, MT 59642 | $121,850 |
42 | Bonnie J Lower | Willow Creek, MT 59760 | $121,633 |
43 | Keyhole Cattle Co | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $121,617 |
44 | Raschke Limited Partnership | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $119,937 |
45 | Ben Hurwitz | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $111,634 |
46 | Raymond N Russell | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $108,416 |
47 | Snowbank Ranch LLC | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $108,031 |
48 | Dan Rader | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $104,767 |
49 | David Brewer | Ringling, MT 59642 | $100,137 |
50 | Snowbank Ranch | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $92,996 |
51 | Jackson Ranches | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $92,994 |
52 | Rose Cattle Company LLC | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $91,583 |
53 | Townsend Brothers LLC | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $84,073 |
54 | Elizabeth A Johnston | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $76,232 |
55 | Joy Short | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $74,928 |
56 | Jill C Galt | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $74,492 |
57 | Mcguire Ranches | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $73,267 |
58 | Helen Dupea | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $73,188 |
59 | Sixteen Mile Creek Ranch Limited | Livingston, MT 59047 | $70,588 |
60 | Matthew S Kmon LLC | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $69,461 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”