Total Conservation Programs in Meagher County, Montana, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 75

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $5,008,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2021
21Scott A JacksonWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$35,847
22David VoldsethMartinsdale, MT 59053$33,509
23Errol T GaltMartinsdale, MT 59053$32,881
24Holmstrom Land Co IncWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$32,533
25Stephen G BuckinghamWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$31,666
26Matthew S Kmon LLCWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$28,665
27Crazy M Ranch LpFairfield, CA 94534$28,647
28Ruth E JohnstonWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$25,879
29Ralph K MillerWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$24,849
30Springdale ColonyWht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645$24,119
31Ronald StraughDeer Lodge, MT 59722$20,571
32Teague Ranches IncWht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645$19,032
33Rhynard Ranch LlpMartinsdale, MT 59053$17,768
34George A BergWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$17,302
35Estate Of Lorraine GuentherBelgrade, MT 59714$16,436
36Brian L BodellWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$13,683
37Mary E HansonWht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645$12,410
38Wallace L BaileyWht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645$12,113
39Rodney J BrewerRingling, MT 59642$12,108
40Ronald L BurnsWht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645$11,624

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag