Farm Subsidy information
Mineral County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Mineral County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 53
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mineral County, Montana totaled $1,331,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tricon Timber LLC | Saint Regis, MT 59866 | $502,373 |
2 | William Jerome Wheeler Jr | Superior, MT 59872 | $183,452 |
3 | Wayne Boyes | Superior, MT 59872 | $95,517 |
4 | Donallys Inc | Superior, MT 59872 | $82,801 |
5 | Billye A Bricker | Superior, MT 59872 | $67,340 |
6 | Wheeler Livestock | Missoula, MT 59807 | $65,442 |
7 | Tm Logging LLC | Superior, MT 59872 | $52,875 |
8 | Warnkens Inc | Superior, MT 59872 | $30,887 |
9 | Kevin P Donally | Superior, MT 59872 | $27,342 |
10 | Yvonne M Wheeler | Superior, MT 59872 | $26,684 |
11 | Alan Lee Niswonger | Superior, MT 59872 | $21,393 |
12 | Johnson Brothers Forest Resource | Missoula, MT 59808 | $20,560 |
13 | Carole Johnson | Superior, MT 59872 | $17,742 |
14 | Randy Russ | Superior, MT 59872 | $15,675 |
15 | Raymond P Rugg | Superior, MT 59872 | $14,838 |
16 | Michael J Donally | Ballantine, MT 59006 | $11,872 |
17 | R Dirk Ewing | Orofino, ID 83544 | $9,136 |
18 | Oliver Lee St. Clair | Alberton, MT 59820 | $8,537 |
19 | Denley M Loge | Saint Regis, MT 59866 | $8,345 |
20 | Richard Hollenback | Superior, MT 59872 | $7,609 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>