Farm Subsidy information
Phillips County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Phillips County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 410
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Phillips County, Montana totaled $31,444,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Double O Ranch Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $243,104 |
22 | Wasson Ranch Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $239,723 |
23 | Maloney Brothers Partnership | Turner, MT 59542 | $231,931 |
24 | Aaron Albus | Saco, MT 59261 | $227,609 |
25 | A W Billmayer Inc | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $224,769 |
26 | Harry Austin Lmt Ptr | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $220,722 |
27 | Glenn Meisdalen | Malta, MT 59538 | $220,216 |
28 | Craig Ottinger | Malta, MT 59538 | $218,859 |
29 | Lazy J D Cattle Company | Dodson, MT 59524 | $213,401 |
30 | Matthew Shane Anderson | Malta, MT 59538 | $212,449 |
31 | Dunbar Brothers | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $206,504 |
32 | John Meisdalen | Malta, MT 59538 | $206,265 |
33 | Bowdoin Farms Llp | Malta, MT 59538 | $202,833 |
34 | Frenchman Valley Ranch Ptnrshp | Saco, MT 59261 | $202,508 |
35 | Kyle Salveson | Malta, MT 59538 | $194,571 |
36 | 379 Farms, Llp | Malta, MT 59538 | $192,988 |
37 | Honeys Family Farms LLC | Dodson, MT 59524 | $186,224 |
38 | Dusty Emond | Malta, MT 59538 | $183,222 |
39 | 2 Lazy K Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $180,978 |
40 | Glen Sims | Malta, MT 59538 | $180,112 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”