Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Phillips County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 262
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Phillips County, Montana totaled $7,157,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Barnard Ranch 13 | Malta, MT 59538 | $40,266 |
62 | Taylor Ranch Llp | Saco, MT 59261 | $39,855 |
63 | Cobblestone Ranch Llp | Loring, MT 59537 | $37,001 |
64 | Maloney Brothers Partnership | Turner, MT 59542 | $36,100 |
65 | D & K Livestock Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $36,081 |
66 | Scott Waters | Malta, MT 59538 | $36,027 |
67 | Mitchell Ranch 1913 LLC | Dodson, MT 59524 | $35,831 |
68 | Jason D Ulrich | Malta, MT 59538 | $35,440 |
69 | Dustin Hofeldt | Chinook, MT 59523 | $35,430 |
70 | Taylor Fouts | Turner, MT 59542 | $33,355 |
71 | Glenn Meisdalen | Malta, MT 59538 | $33,129 |
72 | Heather Martin | Malta, MT 59538 | $32,781 |
73 | East Malta Hutterian Brethren | Malta, MT 59538 | $32,411 |
74 | Milk River Honey Co | Malta, MT 59538 | $32,322 |
75 | Murdock Ranch Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $31,818 |
76 | , | $31,809 | |
77 | Bruckner Ranch Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $31,781 |
78 | Teepee Ring Ranch Inc | Dodson, MT 59524 | $31,413 |
79 | Ronna Holman | Malta, MT 59538 | $29,701 |
80 | Clinton Cox Ranch Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $29,666 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”