Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Phillips County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 236
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Phillips County, Montana totaled $7,005,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bill Webb | Malta, MT 59538 | $223,398 |
2 | Salsbery Bros. | Malta, MT 59538 | $190,665 |
3 | First Creek Ranch Inc | Saco, MT 59261 | $158,652 |
4 | Wasson Ranch Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $123,780 |
5 | Veseth And Veseth Lvst Co Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $117,875 |
6 | F Anderson Ranch Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $117,875 |
7 | Olsen Grain & Livestock Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $117,875 |
8 | B & C French LLC | Malta, MT 59538 | $117,875 |
9 | Nine Bar Six Inc | Zortman, MT 59546 | $117,494 |
10 | Kyle Salveson | Malta, MT 59538 | $113,955 |
11 | H J Hammond Ranch Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $113,549 |
12 | Taylor Ranch Llp | Saco, MT 59261 | $111,947 |
13 | Mdh Ranch Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $107,027 |
14 | Costin Ranch Co | Saco, MT 59261 | $105,668 |
15 | Dunbar Brothers | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $102,206 |
16 | Matthew Shane Anderson | Malta, MT 59538 | $95,814 |
17 | H Bar J Ranch | Malta, MT 59538 | $94,413 |
18 | Bruckner Cattle Company | Malta, MT 59538 | $91,888 |
19 | Lazy J D Cattle Company | Dodson, MT 59524 | $90,626 |
20 | Frenchman Valley Ranch Ptnrshp | Saco, MT 59261 | $87,101 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>