Farm Subsidy information
Phillips County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Phillips County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 526
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Phillips County, Montana totaled $17,859,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dunbar Brothers | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $121,009 |
22 | Kyle Salveson | Malta, MT 59538 | $119,814 |
23 | Newby/wyse Farms Inc | Dodson, MT 59524 | $118,466 |
24 | Dustin Hofeldt | Chinook, MT 59523 | $115,974 |
25 | A&j Christofferson Farms Lmt Prt | Malta, MT 59538 | $109,121 |
26 | Mule Tracks Cattle Co | Malta, MT 59538 | $107,258 |
27 | Lazy J5 Ranch Co | Malta, MT 59538 | $104,480 |
28 | Blooming Prairie Inc | Loring, MT 59537 | $101,649 |
29 | James W Murdock | Malta, MT 59538 | $99,243 |
30 | Michael Morrison Farms Inc | Loring, MT 59537 | $96,560 |
31 | Douglas F Hofeldt | Chinook, MT 59523 | $93,907 |
32 | Barnard Ranch Inc | Hinsdale, MT 59241 | $88,000 |
33 | R Math Farms Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $86,308 |
34 | Vicki Hofeldt | Chinook, MT 59523 | $86,302 |
35 | Harry Austin Lmt Ptr | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $85,506 |
36 | Maloney Brothers Partnership | Turner, MT 59542 | $84,568 |
37 | Robert Dolphay | Dodson, MT 59524 | $82,889 |
38 | Bruckner Ranch Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $82,444 |
39 | Double O Ranch Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $82,003 |
40 | F Anderson Ranch Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $76,227 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”