Farm Subsidy information
Phillips County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Phillips County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,674
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Phillips County, Montana totaled $357,696,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James W Murdock | Malta, MT 59538 | $1,178,457 |
42 | Donald J Drabbels | Malta, MT 59538 | $1,175,133 |
43 | North Bench Farms Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $1,174,140 |
44 | F Scott Robinson | Malta, MT 59538 | $1,158,437 |
45 | Benny L Milks | Billings, MT 59101 | $1,146,685 |
46 | First Creek Ranch Inc | Saco, MT 59261 | $1,123,338 |
47 | U2 Ranch Inc | Loring, MT 59537 | $1,092,230 |
48 | Depuydt Farms Inc | Saco, MT 59261 | $1,090,339 |
49 | B & L Farm & Ranch Llp | Malta, MT 59538 | $1,072,598 |
50 | Sunford Farms Llp | Saco, MT 59261 | $1,067,544 |
51 | Milk River Ranch Inc | Billings, MT 59101 | $1,058,912 |
52 | Tom Anderson | Malta, MT 59538 | $1,057,090 |
53 | John Wilke | Malta, MT 59538 | $1,053,887 |
54 | Barb Waters | Malta, MT 59538 | $1,051,233 |
55 | Bebee Farming Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $1,029,066 |
56 | Rocky Ridge Ranch Inc | Dodson, MT 59524 | $993,660 |
57 | Teepee Ring Ranch Inc | Dodson, MT 59524 | $978,487 |
58 | E & M Remy Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $961,851 |
59 | Holman Hereford Home | Malta, MT 59538 | $954,625 |
60 | Robert Dolphay | Dodson, MT 59524 | $953,186 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”