Total Commodity Programs in Phillips County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,359
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Phillips County, Montana totaled $116,333,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Loring Hutterian Brethren | Loring, MT 59537 | $2,452,831 |
2 | East Malta Hutterian Brethren | Malta, MT 59538 | $2,026,171 |
3 | Simonson Ranch Inc | Billings, MT 59106 | $1,982,263 |
4 | H Bar J Ranch | Malta, MT 59538 | $1,748,812 |
5 | Olsen Grain & Livestock Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $1,640,635 |
6 | Mdh Ranch Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $1,605,515 |
7 | French Farming | Malta, MT 59538 | $1,409,895 |
8 | Newby/wyse Farms Inc | Dodson, MT 59524 | $1,258,685 |
9 | Wcs Farming | Malta, MT 59538 | $1,214,207 |
10 | Independence Bank ** | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,120,987 |
11 | F Anderson Ranch Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $1,098,349 |
12 | Michael Morrison Farms Inc | Loring, MT 59537 | $1,059,612 |
13 | Veseth And Veseth Lvst Co Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $1,045,745 |
14 | Four D Farm & Ranch | Saco, MT 59261 | $1,041,522 |
15 | R Math Farms Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $1,029,384 |
16 | Grabofsky Livestock & Grain Inc | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $1,008,238 |
17 | Mortenson Farms Inc | Dodson, MT 59524 | $961,665 |
18 | Bruckner Ranch Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $923,314 |
19 | Brian Eggebrecht | Malta, MT 59538 | $903,595 |
20 | John Meisdalen | Malta, MT 59538 | $887,144 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>