Farm Subsidy information
Powder River County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Powder River County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 907
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Powder River County, Montana totaled $128,280,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Olivarez Honey Bees Inc | Orland, CA 95963 | $2,711,097 |
2 | Mangen Ranch | Broadus, MT 59317 | $1,908,380 |
3 | Mobley Land Inc | Olive, MT 59343 | $1,886,587 |
4 | Smith Cattle Co | Olive, MT 59343 | $1,845,914 |
5 | Occ-o'connor Crops & Cattle LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $1,674,864 |
6 | Green Acre Ranch Inc | Olive, MT 59343 | $1,444,040 |
7 | E B Ranch | Broadus, MT 59317 | $1,348,696 |
8 | Rumph Ranch Partnership | Broadus, MT 59317 | $1,344,251 |
9 | Donald Pearce | Broadus, MT 59317 | $1,341,036 |
10 | K & D Livestock Inc | Volborg, MT 59351 | $1,332,626 |
11 | Richard Kiekow | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,332,316 |
12 | Seldo Company Inc | Boyes, MT 59316 | $1,322,080 |
13 | Minow Ranch Inc | Olive, MT 59343 | $1,287,552 |
14 | Mcgill Land & Livestock Inc | Powderville, MT 59345 | $1,190,425 |
15 | Jurica Corporation | Broadus, MT 59317 | $1,172,314 |
16 | Russiff Ranch Co | Olive, MT 59343 | $1,154,540 |
17 | Karrels Cattle Co LLC | Broadus, MT 59317 | $1,112,756 |
18 | Quentin Rumph | Biddle, MT 59314 | $1,069,889 |
19 | Kenneth R Bird | Volborg, MT 59351 | $1,030,140 |
20 | Bales Ranch Inc | Otter, MT 59062 | $1,019,130 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>