Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Powell County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 81
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Powell County, Montana totaled $532,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mcqueary Ranch Partnership | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $10,741 |
22 | Ted R Beck | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $10,490 |
23 | Geary Brothers Inc | Helmville, MT 59843 | $10,212 |
24 | Perkins Ranch LLC | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $9,651 |
25 | Western Montana Land & Livestock LLC | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $9,047 |
26 | Melany Mannix | Avon, MT 59713 | $7,825 |
27 | John Paul Price | Avon, MT 59713 | $7,590 |
28 | Donald Walter /dw/ Beck | Garrison, MT 59731 | $7,390 |
29 | Dutton Hereford Ranch | Gold Creek, MT 59733 | $7,343 |
30 | Garnet Ranch Lp | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $7,325 |
31 | 5 Rockin' Ms Angus Ranch Inc | Bridgeport, TX 76426 | $6,437 |
32 | Broken Circle Ranch Co Inc | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $6,383 |
33 | Thomas Herefords Inc | Gold Creek, MT 59733 | $5,692 |
34 | Vanisko Ranches Inc | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $5,575 |
35 | William O Pauley | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $5,124 |
36 | Mr Ryan W Ueland | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $4,996 |
37 | John J Senecal | Avon, MT 59713 | $4,972 |
38 | John P Senecal | Avon, MT 59713 | $4,889 |
39 | Aspen Grove Ranch LLC | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $4,883 |
40 | Kaehl Berg | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $4,515 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”