Farm Subsidy information
Roosevelt County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Roosevelt County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 416
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Roosevelt County, Montana totaled $41,677,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Skillingberg & Sons Inc | Homestead, MT 59242 | $249,090 |
22 | Glen A Bummer | Reserve, MT 59258 | $248,347 |
23 | Scott Toavs | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $235,965 |
24 | Treasure State Grain Inc | Brockton, MT 59213 | $231,888 |
25 | David V Matejovsky | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $227,774 |
26 | Ryder Farms LLC | Froid, MT 59226 | $223,745 |
27 | Rochelle Berg | Poplar, MT 59255 | $219,529 |
28 | Bush Ranch Inc | Poplar, MT 59255 | $208,634 |
29 | Stensland Land & Livestock Compan | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $204,729 |
30 | Haakon Bruce Jorgenson Jr | Williston, ND 58801 | $202,586 |
31 | John A Knudsen | Poplar, MT 59255 | $200,113 |
32 | Kristal Nordwick | Poplar, MT 59255 | $197,901 |
33 | Terry Traeger | Bainville, MT 59212 | $195,893 |
34 | Michelle L Toavs | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $195,494 |
35 | Christopher Thomas Hansen | Bainville, MT 59212 | $194,859 |
36 | Bears Coulee Ranch LLC | Bainville, MT 59212 | $194,672 |
37 | Robert Drummond | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $194,381 |
38 | Brian J Berg | Poplar, MT 59255 | $193,225 |
39 | Sheila Rae Toavs Miller | Nashua, MT 59248 | $190,111 |
40 | Milo Stangeland Jr | Brockton, MT 59213 | $176,187 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”