Farm Subsidy information
Roosevelt County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Roosevelt County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,486
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Roosevelt County, Montana totaled $484,935,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Scott Toavs | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $823,803 |
102 | Arthur Gaylord Ryder | Froid, MT 59226 | $817,646 |
103 | Duane S Nygaard | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $812,307 |
104 | Jeremy J Hoffman | Brockton, MT 59213 | $794,618 |
105 | Gary Ediger | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $790,901 |
106 | Arlin Hansen | Poplar, MT 59255 | $778,143 |
107 | Roy A Toavs Sr | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $775,813 |
108 | Romo Brothers Llp | Bainville, MT 59212 | $766,976 |
109 | Boysun Grain Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $766,597 |
110 | Bartel Ranch Inc | Cody, WY 82414 | $755,755 |
111 | Dirk Edward Peterson | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $752,535 |
112 | Robert Rudolph | Bainville, MT 59212 | $751,297 |
113 | Rodney Bartel | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $748,311 |
114 | Shanks Family Corporation | Roberts, MT 59070 | $737,211 |
115 | Elisa Olsen | Culbertson, MT 59218 | $730,504 |
116 | Leroy L Panasuk | Grand Rapids, MN 55744 | $730,202 |
117 | Delaine Ault | Poplar, MT 59255 | $720,922 |
118 | Bears Coulee Ranch LLC | Bainville, MT 59212 | $718,003 |
119 | Gary Grainger | Poplar, MT 59255 | $712,739 |
120 | Syvert James Mahlen | Williston, ND 58801 | $708,650 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”