Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Rosebud County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 131
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Rosebud County, Montana totaled $2,143,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Schiffer Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $27,408 |
22 | David Davenport | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $27,326 |
23 | Gene T Small | Lame Deer, MT 59043 | $26,190 |
24 | 71 Ranch Lp | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $23,275 |
25 | Jack L Ferguson | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $20,713 |
26 | Justin Schwend | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $19,428 |
27 | Keefer Land & Livestock Co | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $17,773 |
28 | Daniel R Johnson | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $17,386 |
29 | Ronald T Johnson | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $16,914 |
30 | Justin S Kincheloe | Melstone, MT 59054 | $16,750 |
31 | Grebe Family Limited Partnership | Melstone, MT 59054 | $16,726 |
32 | Joseph T Kurkowski | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $15,771 |
33 | Horace Small Jr | Lame Deer, MT 59043 | $15,356 |
34 | Bailey Cattle Company LLC | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $15,303 |
35 | Scott E Weber | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $14,561 |
36 | Four L Land And Livestock | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $14,183 |
37 | Colton Thomas Allen | Melstone, MT 59054 | $13,658 |
38 | Clayton Lee Jones | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $11,844 |
39 | Marjorie Knobloch | Birney, MT 59012 | $11,710 |
40 | Colton John Small | Lame Deer, MT 59043 | $11,490 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”