Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Rosebud County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 223
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Rosebud County, Montana totaled $6,895,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Golder Ranch Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $83,016 |
22 | Charles B Moore | Miles City, MT 59301 | $81,509 |
23 | Felton Angus Ranch Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $77,652 |
24 | Daniel Valdez | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $76,455 |
25 | Red Canyon Ranch Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $66,665 |
26 | Cole James Cook | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $62,110 |
27 | Sharon K Small | Ashland, MT 59003 | $61,886 |
28 | Vananda Cattle Company | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $61,415 |
29 | Jesse R Lee | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $60,840 |
30 | Mickell Cattle Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $60,754 |
31 | Martin Reierson | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $55,478 |
32 | James M Robinson III | Ashland, MT 59003 | $54,720 |
33 | Horace Small Jr | Lame Deer, MT 59043 | $54,612 |
34 | Steve J Morgan | Fromberg, MT 59029 | $54,525 |
35 | Rocker 6 Cattle Co | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $53,482 |
36 | Larsen Land & Livestock Co | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $53,129 |
37 | Killen Land & Livestock | Angela, MT 59312 | $52,579 |
38 | Peggy Fredericks | Busby, MT 59016 | $47,926 |
39 | Paul J Hofer | Sumatra, MT 59083 | $47,677 |
40 | Don D Polich | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $47,571 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”