Total Disaster Programs in Rosebud County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 225
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Rosebud County, Montana totaled $13,420,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Justin Schwend | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $28,315 |
102 | Clay R Kincheloe | Miles City, MT 59301 | $28,226 |
103 | Felton Angus Ranch Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $28,160 |
104 | Colton Thomas Allen | Melstone, MT 59054 | $27,307 |
105 | Michael Schiffer | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $26,856 |
106 | Gerald Ackerman | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $25,897 |
107 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $25,690 |
108 | Raymond J Smith | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $25,614 |
109 | , | $25,510 | |
110 | Scott E Weber | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $24,927 |
111 | Geneva Biery | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $24,851 |
112 | Mark D Holmes | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $24,525 |
113 | Bailey Cattle Company LLC | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $24,143 |
114 | Llevando Fisher Sr | Lame Deer, MT 59043 | $23,723 |
115 | Douglas Martens | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $23,134 |
116 | Roger Raymond Notsch | Volborg, MT 59351 | $22,346 |
117 | Donald John Cameron | Ingomar, MT 59039 | $22,140 |
118 | Uall Creek Ranch Inc | Angela, MT 59312 | $21,945 |
119 | , | $21,359 | |
120 | Philip E Steinberger | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $20,967 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”