Farm Subsidy information
Rosebud County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Rosebud County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,086
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rosebud County, Montana totaled $131,213,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Donald John Cameron | Ingomar, MT 59039 | $626,008 |
42 | Tammie S Anderson | Wright, WY 82732 | $624,055 |
43 | Brock Galt | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $615,630 |
44 | Jason Hirsch | Miles City, MT 59301 | $597,693 |
45 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $560,329 |
46 | Dallas & Cindy Steiger | Hysham, MT 59038 | $518,008 |
47 | Nile Enterprises Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $517,724 |
48 | Cross Four Cattle LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $516,617 |
49 | Paul A Kanta | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $516,076 |
50 | Mereness Farms | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $515,575 |
51 | Eli Spannagel Jr | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $513,669 |
52 | Jesse R Lee | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $506,890 |
53 | Glen Leonhardt And Carla Leonhardt | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $493,846 |
54 | Felton Angus Ranch Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $491,185 |
55 | Steve Thoeny | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $488,654 |
56 | Sharon C Martens | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $482,239 |
57 | Egan Ranch Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $472,411 |
58 | Three-n-farm | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $464,017 |
59 | Windancer Farms General Partnership | Miles City, MT 59301 | $461,712 |
60 | Louise R Galt Revocable Living Tr | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $457,467 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”