Farm Subsidy information
Rosebud County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Rosebud County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 252
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rosebud County, Montana totaled $15,422,000 in in 2022.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jason And Tanya Brewer | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $630,304 |
| 2 | Fredrick D Wacker And Gwendolyn K Wacker Dba Cross | Miles City, MT 59301 | $576,340 |
| 3 | Middle Fork Land & Livestock Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $527,347 |
| 4 | Schiffer Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $437,237 |
| 5 | Montgomery Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $395,131 |
| 6 | Cavin Steiger | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $382,901 |
| 7 | Sorenson Farms Of Montana | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $347,259 |
| 8 | Grebe Family Limited Partnership | Melstone, MT 59054 | $332,944 |
| 9 | David Davenport | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $314,419 |
| 10 | Jason And Jennifer Hirsch | Miles City, MT 59301 | $309,051 |
| 11 | Keefer Land & Livestock Co | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $276,299 |
| 12 | Killen Land & Livestock | Angela, MT 59312 | $257,325 |
| 13 | Greenleaf Land & Livestock | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $257,299 |
| 14 | Hammond Valley Colony Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $244,490 |
| 15 | Cross Four Cattle LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $241,934 |
| 16 | Four L Land And Livestock | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $237,982 |
| 17 | Christian K Bends | Ashland, MT 59003 | $211,350 |
| 18 | Robert Newman | Melstone, MT 59054 | $195,135 |
| 19 | Daniel Valdez | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $180,474 |
| 20 | Cole Michael Hirsch | Miles City, MT 59301 | $170,344 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
