Total Disaster Programs in Rosebud County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 726
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Rosebud County, Montana totaled $26,876,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Terry Patterson | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $280,016 |
22 | Vassau-flying X Ranch | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $274,665 |
23 | Red Canyon Ranch Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $262,981 |
24 | Daniel Valdez | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $229,933 |
25 | Middle Fork Land & Livestock Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $228,643 |
26 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $227,096 |
27 | Larsen Land & Livestock Co | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $224,547 |
28 | Ernest D Robinson | Ashland, MT 59003 | $220,051 |
29 | William A Swanson | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $218,451 |
30 | Robert Dellit | Sumatra, MT 59083 | $216,216 |
31 | Bailey Cattle Company LLC | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $201,893 |
32 | Booth Land & Livestock | Lucerne, CO 80646 | $200,493 |
33 | Biery Bros | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $181,933 |
34 | Hein Cattle Company | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $170,435 |
35 | Nance Cattle Co | Birney, MT 59012 | $169,825 |
36 | Christian K Bends | Ashland, MT 59003 | $167,283 |
37 | Paul J Hofer | Sumatra, MT 59083 | $165,465 |
38 | James Dahle Sr | Lame Deer, MT 59043 | $164,717 |
39 | Victor Small Jr | Lame Deer, MT 59043 | $152,209 |
40 | Hrubes Bros Partnership | Riverton, WY 82501 | $150,679 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”