Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Rosebud County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 171
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Rosebud County, Montana totaled $6,965,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Joann Brewer Dba Joann Brewer Far | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $25,647 |
42 | Broadus Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $24,296 |
43 | Paul J Hofer | Sumatra, MT 59083 | $24,033 |
44 | Middle Fork Land & Livestock Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $23,097 |
45 | Cole Michael Hirsch | Miles City, MT 59301 | $22,256 |
46 | Jack Schwend | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $22,126 |
47 | Matthew W Kanta | Billings, MT 59106 | $20,727 |
48 | Curtis Biery | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $20,238 |
49 | Joseph J Schiffer | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $19,671 |
50 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $19,235 |
51 | Jack L Ferguson | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $18,761 |
52 | Jack L Helland | Miles City, MT 59301 | $18,619 |
53 | Jean K Spannagel | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $17,624 |
54 | Salmond Ranch Company | Choteau, MT 59422 | $17,493 |
55 | Udee Creek LLC | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $17,086 |
56 | Dick L Ferguson | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $16,812 |
57 | Raymond J Smith | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $16,108 |
58 | Joseph D Hofer | Huntley, MT 59037 | $15,666 |
59 | Felton Angus Ranch Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $14,998 |
60 | Pot Hook Ranch Partnership | Melstone, MT 59054 | $14,982 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”