Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Sanders County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 90
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Sanders County, Montana totaled $1,136,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Baker Land & Cattle Co Inc | Hot Springs, MT 59845 | $97,171 |
2 | Prongua Ranch Co | Hot Springs, MT 59845 | $95,304 |
3 | Ross Middlemist | Dixon, MT 59831 | $40,566 |
4 | John Marrinan | Plains, MT 59859 | $36,006 |
5 | Evan J Melton | Hot Springs, MT 59845 | $34,992 |
6 | Shawn Christensen | Hot Springs, MT 59845 | $32,494 |
7 | Lando Roy Bras | Hot Springs, MT 59848 | $31,006 |
8 | Wayne C Cross | Plains, MT 59859 | $30,437 |
9 | Jason K Mcdonald | Lonepine, MT 59848 | $29,027 |
10 | Bruce E White | Hot Springs, MT 59845 | $27,045 |
11 | Lauraine Johnson | Plains, MT 59859 | $26,615 |
12 | Holland Homestead Ranch LLC | Plains, MT 59859 | $26,310 |
13 | Jeff Malinak | Hot Springs, MT 59845 | $25,932 |
14 | Wt Cattle Company LLC | Hot Springs, MT 59845 | $25,689 |
15 | Mcdonald Ranch Inc | Hot Springs, MT 59845 | $25,451 |
16 | Marlene Nicholson | Dixon, MT 59831 | $18,747 |
17 | Trever Allen Heidegger | Lonepine, MT 59848 | $18,389 |
18 | Terry L Pitts | Dixon, MT 59831 | $18,106 |
19 | Scott F Fredrickson | Hot Springs, MT 59845 | $17,332 |
20 | Gerald Lee Hamel | Dixon, MT 59831 | $16,764 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>