Total Emergency Relief Program in Sheridan County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 328
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Sheridan County, Montana totaled $24,654,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kelsey Lodahl | Brockton, MT 59213 | $250,000 |
22 | 4-way Farms Inc | Medicine Lake, MT 59247 | $246,300 |
23 | Jensen Farms Partnership | Westby, MT 59275 | $242,712 |
24 | Richard & Mary Sampsen Jv | Dagmar, MT 59219 | $241,180 |
25 | Les A Abenroth | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $233,750 |
26 | Syme Farms Inc | Raymond, MT 59256 | $229,483 |
27 | Michels Agribusiness Inc | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $229,287 |
28 | C N & G Inc | Medicine Lake, MT 59247 | $227,363 |
29 | Golden Prairie Farms Inc | Antelope, MT 59211 | $226,225 |
30 | Roman J Rang | Medicine Lake, MT 59247 | $219,172 |
31 | Steve J Hove | Homestead, MT 59242 | $215,566 |
32 | Aasheim Farms Gp | Reserve, MT 59258 | $200,009 |
33 | Ator Farms Inc | Medicine Lake, MT 59247 | $199,731 |
34 | Tri-henke Farms Inc | Dagmar, MT 59219 | $198,257 |
35 | Nathan Shackelford | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $196,505 |
36 | Jeffrey Lindblom | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $193,114 |
37 | Westergard Farms LLC | Dagmar, MT 59219 | $193,113 |
38 | Wangerin Brothers Inc | Outlook, MT 59252 | $176,090 |
39 | Daneville Farms Inc | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $173,755 |
40 | Ethan E Moberg | Redstone, MT 59257 | $171,077 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”