Farm Subsidy information
Sheridan County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Sheridan County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,661
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sheridan County, Montana totaled $517,903,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Martha L Kanning | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $1,021,172 |
82 | Tefre Farm And Ranch Inc | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $1,018,352 |
83 | Overby Farms | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $1,007,542 |
84 | G & L Farms Inc | Westby, MT 59275 | $1,002,254 |
85 | Nash Brothers | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $984,713 |
86 | Clyde L Hellegaard | Westby, MT 59275 | $981,208 |
87 | Tina Deubner | Medicine Lake, MT 59247 | $973,576 |
88 | Silas Kanning | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $970,622 |
89 | Gray & Sons | Cave Creek, AZ 85331 | $962,795 |
90 | Curtis Kleppen | Outlook, MT 59252 | $962,639 |
91 | Harvey S Urdahl | Homestead, MT 59242 | $956,584 |
92 | Brian J Kaae | Dagmar, MT 59219 | $941,561 |
93 | R & D Engstrom Farms | Medicine Lake, MT 59247 | $939,342 |
94 | Cecil D Marsh | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $939,255 |
95 | Cheryl Deubner | Medicine Lake, MT 59247 | $936,703 |
96 | Skillingberg & Sons Inc | Homestead, MT 59242 | $931,289 |
97 | J W G Farms Inc | Medicine Lake, MT 59247 | $922,653 |
98 | G & G Farms Inc | Dagmar, MT 59219 | $921,015 |
99 | Overby Agribusiness Inc | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $920,501 |
100 | Rasmussen Farms 1913 | Antelope, MT 59211 | $918,972 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”