Conservation Reserve Program in Sheridan County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 193
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sheridan County, Montana totaled $1,364,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Connie M Wangerin | Outlook, MT 59252 | $5,530 |
82 | , | $5,530 | |
83 | , | $5,512 | |
84 | Carl E Friedrich | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $5,352 |
85 | Lazy Ak Farms Inc | Redstone, MT 59257 | $4,956 |
86 | Alvin V Christensen Irrv Trust | Antelope, MT 59211 | $4,732 |
87 | Myra E Christensen Irrv Trust | Antelope, MT 59211 | $4,732 |
88 | Kisler Ranch LLC | Las Vegas, NV 89119 | $4,624 |
89 | Vicky L Haddix | Medicine Lake, MT 59247 | $4,574 |
90 | Marilyn L Shoal | Columbia Falls, MT 59912 | $4,570 |
91 | Murray Farms | Reserve, MT 59258 | $4,536 |
92 | , | $4,496 | |
93 | Willard J French | Sun City West, AZ 85375 | $4,172 |
94 | Robert & Joanne Andring Family Trust | Chandler, AZ 85248 | $4,027 |
95 | Anderson Farms Inc | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $4,011 |
96 | Donald Friedrich Revocable Trust | Antelope, MT 59211 | $3,908 |
97 | Tim J Holte | Outlook, MT 59252 | $3,877 |
98 | Rasmussen Farms 1913 | Antelope, MT 59211 | $3,854 |
99 | Chase D Campbell | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $3,845 |
100 | Somer C Weich | Boise, ID 83716 | $3,845 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”