Total Disaster Programs in Stillwater County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 775
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Stillwater County, Montana totaled $25,845,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Diana Scollard | Absarokee, MT 59001 | $168,392 |
42 | Katherine Mckeith | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $167,583 |
43 | Lodgepole Ranch LLC | Nye, MT 59061 | $166,773 |
44 | Leuthold Valley Creek Rn Inc | Molt, MT 59057 | $162,963 |
45 | James Stampfel | Absarokee, MT 59001 | $162,515 |
46 | Lehfeldt Rambouillets | Lavina, MT 59046 | $156,918 |
47 | Ray Guthrie Jr | Absarokee, MT 59001 | $151,893 |
48 | Carl Thompson | Columbus, MT 59019 | $151,390 |
49 | Ronald Olson | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $150,939 |
50 | David P Peterson | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $146,566 |
51 | Van Oosten Ranch Inc | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $144,448 |
52 | Darwin C Lehfeldt | Bozeman, MT 59715 | $141,191 |
53 | Terry L Pierce | Molt, MT 59057 | $140,930 |
54 | Lowell Angus Ranch | Park City, MT 59063 | $129,115 |
55 | Bar Four F Ranch Inc | Broadview, MT 59015 | $128,506 |
56 | Sam J Ketchum | Broadview, MT 59015 | $127,179 |
57 | William Vanvalkenburgh | Columbus, MT 59019 | $126,752 |
58 | Hilcrest Ranch Of Rapelje | Columbus, MT 59019 | $124,765 |
59 | Mark D Pederson | Columbus, MT 59019 | $124,553 |
60 | Ralph Lewis | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $121,906 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”