Total Conservation Programs in Stillwater County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 508
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Stillwater County, Montana totaled $35,810,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jack Wegner | Columbus, MT 59019 | $119,790 |
82 | Donald R Nordahl | Rapelje, MT 59067 | $115,909 |
83 | Martin R Robuck | Rapelje, MT 59067 | $114,303 |
84 | Mattick Farm & Ranch Inc | Billings, MT 59101 | $113,706 |
85 | Terry L Pierce | Molt, MT 59057 | $111,971 |
86 | Robert C Lorash | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $111,504 |
87 | Martha Zindler | Billings, MT 59101 | $111,010 |
88 | Heather Jones | Las Cruces, NM 88004 | $109,709 |
89 | Susan A Arnold | Broadview, MT 59015 | $109,391 |
90 | Franklin R Mosdal | Billings, MT 59102 | $108,986 |
91 | Janet Brown | Billings, MT 59102 | $105,021 |
92 | Hilcrest Ranch Of Rapelje | Columbus, MT 59019 | $103,394 |
93 | Roy L Clark | Acton, MT 59002 | $102,743 |
94 | Leona Maki | Columbus, MT 59019 | $100,800 |
95 | Scarr Family Limited Partnership | Tucson, AZ 85715 | $99,518 |
96 | Ladies Basin Wheat Farm Receivership | Volborg, MT 59351 | $98,304 |
97 | Della Mae Coon | Torrington, WY 82240 | $96,624 |
98 | Evelyn Wilcox | Rapelje, MT 59067 | $96,244 |
99 | Clarence F Kirchner Estate | Rapelje, MT 59067 | $94,883 |
100 | Montana Board Of Investments - Se | Saint Paul, MN 55170 | $93,042 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”