Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Stillwater County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 418
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Stillwater County, Montana totaled $3,664,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Langford Ranch | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $9,464 |
102 | William Vanvalkenburgh | Columbus, MT 59019 | $9,388 |
103 | Robert Story Jr | Park City, MT 59063 | $9,280 |
104 | Keith Martin | Nye, MT 59061 | $8,994 |
105 | Karen Tertelgte | Columbus, MT 59019 | $8,992 |
106 | Mitchell Jensen | Absarokee, MT 59001 | $8,808 |
107 | Lloyd Zumbrun Jr | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $8,524 |
108 | Jansen Livestock Co | Lavina, MT 59046 | $8,317 |
109 | Lowell Angus Ranch | Park City, MT 59063 | $8,305 |
110 | Mark Yates | Fishtail, MT 59028 | $8,300 |
111 | Doug Jensen | Absarokee, MT 59001 | $8,277 |
112 | Routen Family Trust | Absarokee, MT 59001 | $8,197 |
113 | Ed Tertelgte | Columbus, MT 59019 | $8,095 |
114 | Raymond A Karls | Molt, MT 59057 | $7,807 |
115 | Louis C Dubs | Billings, MT 59106 | $7,732 |
116 | Mark W Berry | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $7,691 |
117 | Karen L Schott | Broadview, MT 59015 | $7,669 |
118 | John Noe | Absarokee, MT 59001 | $7,505 |
119 | Steven A Story | Park City, MT 59063 | $7,446 |
120 | William F Murphy | Absarokee, MT 59001 | $7,163 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”