Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 122
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $933,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hailstone Ranch | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $9,725 |
22 | Roger Dean Indreland | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $9,602 |
23 | Jarrett Ranch LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $9,518 |
24 | Stuart T Stenberg | Mc Leod, MT 59052 | $8,953 |
25 | Sweetgrass Management, Inc. | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $8,490 |
26 | William T Brownlee | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $8,483 |
27 | Jodi R Christensen | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $8,079 |
28 | Pitchfork Cattle LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $7,967 |
29 | Jason D Schwers | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $7,455 |
30 | The Holman Revocable Trust | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $7,294 |
31 | Kevin D Halverson | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $7,043 |
32 | Cumin Ranches, LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $6,825 |
33 | Matthew L Carroccia | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $6,802 |
34 | Brett Todd | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $6,506 |
35 | Marc Hathaway | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $6,461 |
36 | Wallace C Walker | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $6,318 |
37 | Stewart B Drange | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $6,032 |
38 | Shirley J Breck | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $6,006 |
39 | Laubach Red Angus LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $5,724 |
40 | Nathan T Anderson | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $5,511 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”