Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 46
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $193,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lee Roy Goddard | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $3,361 |
22 | Jason D Schwers | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,796 |
23 | Wade Lavoy | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,792 |
24 | Laubach Red Angus LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,493 |
25 | Agnew Livestock LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,369 |
26 | Larry Plaggemeyer | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,591 |
27 | Cayuse Livestock Co | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,573 |
28 | William T Brownlee | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,565 |
29 | Marc Hathaway | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $1,509 |
30 | K Bar A Ranch | Melville, MT 59055 | $1,399 |
31 | Cross Triangle Ranch LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,347 |
32 | Kristopher Stene | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,301 |
33 | Kenneth H Hanson | Shawmut, MT 59078 | $1,158 |
34 | Jason Smith | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,061 |
35 | K A Enterprises Inc | Livingston, MT 59047 | $761 |
36 | Cumin Ranches, LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $694 |
37 | Gary Arlian | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $661 |
38 | Clayton Rch Inc | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $500 |
39 | Justin Tye Cumin | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $428 |
40 | Linda Mcmullen | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $354 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”