Lamb Meat Adjustment Program in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 59
Recipients of Lamb Meat Adjustment Program from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $188,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Lamb Meat Adjustment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Victor L Gibby | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,574 |
22 | Mary Langhus | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,450 |
23 | Barbara Raisland | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $2,371 |
24 | Lynne D Cumin | Columbus, MT 59019 | $2,052 |
25 | Allen Laubach | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,025 |
26 | Justin Tye Cumin | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,940 |
27 | Cole T Cumin | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,795 |
28 | Francis S Cosgriff | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,793 |
29 | Sidney Helvik | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,752 |
30 | Richard D Gibby | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,647 |
31 | Thomas G Agnew | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,602 |
32 | Jean Duffey | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,488 |
33 | Clara L Titeca | Mcleod, MT 59052 | $1,460 |
34 | Green Ranch LLC | Melville, MT 59055 | $1,413 |
35 | Julian Helvik | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,308 |
36 | Wayne Jarrett | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,278 |
37 | Kenneth D Laubach | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,200 |
38 | Michael R Sedgwick | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,098 |
39 | Carolyn Green | Melville, MT 59055 | $966 |
40 | Barry Bittle | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $929 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”