Total Disaster Programs in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 392
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $9,245,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Stewart B Drange | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $96,586 |
22 | Stimpson Inc | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $93,658 |
23 | William T Brownlee | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $93,622 |
24 | Roger Indreland | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $91,339 |
25 | Marlis Arneson | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $90,083 |
26 | Claude Joe Beley | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $83,921 |
27 | Ky Hanson | Shawmut, MT 59078 | $83,717 |
28 | Keewaydin Rch | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $81,876 |
29 | George L Cremer Jr | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $79,699 |
30 | G Kit Beley | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $78,882 |
31 | Lorents Grosfield | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $75,078 |
32 | Larry Plaggemeyer | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $74,533 |
33 | Sage Bainter | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $73,673 |
34 | Hobble Diamond Land & Cattle LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $71,630 |
35 | Horatio Burns | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $71,120 |
36 | The Holman Revocable Trust | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $69,664 |
37 | Glenn R Berg | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $67,770 |
38 | H W Burns Family LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $67,634 |
39 | William W Williams | Summerland, CA 93067 | $65,293 |
40 | Gary C Beley | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $64,121 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”