Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 122
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $933,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | T Bar U Ranch LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $5,503 |
42 | Gary Arlian | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $5,451 |
43 | Larry Plaggemeyer | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $5,252 |
44 | Walter L Plaggemeyer | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $5,140 |
45 | Charles B Schuman | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $5,037 |
46 | David Breck | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $5,001 |
47 | Kenneth D Gilbert | Rapelje, MT 59067 | $4,819 |
48 | Crazy Mountain Cattle Co | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $4,559 |
49 | Keewaydin Rch | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $4,387 |
50 | Kristopher Stene | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $4,356 |
51 | Cynthia L Bainter | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $4,240 |
52 | Ronald James Halverson | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $4,155 |
53 | Larue Livestock LLC | Melville, MT 59055 | $3,964 |
54 | Roger Hammersmark | Mcleod, MT 59052 | $3,858 |
55 | K A Enterprises Inc | Livingston, MT 59047 | $3,826 |
56 | Karen Mckibben | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $3,719 |
57 | Agnew Livestock LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $3,583 |
58 | Andrew Butts | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $3,513 |
59 | Remi Metcalf | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $3,484 |
60 | Bret Metcalf | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $3,484 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”