Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 148
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $3,256,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thomas G Agnew | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $24,829 |
42 | Stuart T Stenberg | Mc Leod, MT 59052 | $24,758 |
43 | Stuart T Stenberg | Mc Leod, MT 59052 | $23,355 |
44 | Shirley J Breck | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $23,041 |
45 | Gary Arlian | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $22,838 |
46 | David A Voldberg | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $22,378 |
47 | Swamp Crk Angus Rch | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $21,621 |
48 | Paul A Becken | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $21,497 |
49 | T Bar U Ranch LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $20,468 |
50 | Lee Roy Goddard | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $18,705 |
51 | The Holman Revocable Trust | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $17,817 |
52 | Philip L Schuman | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $17,548 |
53 | Jon Grosfield | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $17,306 |
54 | Francis S Cosgriff | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $17,049 |
55 | Roger Hammersmark | Mcleod, MT 59052 | $17,002 |
56 | Green Ranch LLC | Melville, MT 59055 | $16,644 |
57 | Steven G Ott | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $16,101 |
58 | , | $15,986 | |
59 | Joseph James Booth | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $15,176 |
60 | Justin Tye Cumin | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $14,274 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”