Direct Payment Program in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 131
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $901,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kirby Family Limited Ptn | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $4,330 |
42 | Alfred Anderson Jr | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $3,964 |
43 | Ole Oiestad | Melville, MT 59055 | $3,572 |
44 | Gary Goddard | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $3,244 |
45 | Rana R Walker | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $3,189 |
46 | William F Cheatham | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $3,159 |
47 | Greg H Langford | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $3,045 |
48 | Paul L Gilbert Living Trust | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,906 |
49 | Glenn R Berg | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,862 |
50 | Gary Arlian | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,803 |
51 | Wm S Fraser | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $2,654 |
52 | T Lawrence Hauge | Columbus, MT 59019 | $2,632 |
53 | Roger T Faw | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,460 |
54 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $2,423 |
55 | Norris Johnson | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,332 |
56 | Walter Scott | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $2,243 |
57 | Gary C Beley | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,232 |
58 | Lawrence Allestad | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,053 |
59 | Stimpson Inc | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $2,031 |
60 | Shirley J Breck | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,932 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”