Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 130
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $3,477,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Andrew Butts | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $12,951 |
62 | Lee Roy Goddard | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $12,916 |
63 | Bret Metcalf | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $12,842 |
64 | Michael Lehman | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $12,567 |
65 | Ky Hanson | Shawmut, MT 59078 | $12,023 |
66 | Engle Ranch Inc | Mc Leod, MT 59052 | $11,725 |
67 | Francis S Cosgriff | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $11,099 |
68 | Linda Mcmullen | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $10,967 |
69 | Kenneth H Hanson | Shawmut, MT 59078 | $10,116 |
70 | Michael Mauland | Rapelje, MT 59067 | $9,936 |
71 | Walton Livestock LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $9,766 |
72 | David A Voldberg | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $9,636 |
73 | Clayton Rch Inc | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $9,379 |
74 | G Kit Beley | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $8,948 |
75 | Peter Becken | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $8,297 |
76 | Rodney Austin Stoltzfus | Mcleod, MT 59052 | $8,236 |
77 | Swamp Crk Angus Rch | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $8,142 |
78 | Wade Lavoy | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $7,975 |
79 | Todd Singbeil | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $7,962 |
80 | Ole T Becken | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $7,816 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”