Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 122
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $933,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Todd Singbeil | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $1,922 |
82 | Francis S Cosgriff | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,723 |
83 | Judith Young | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,703 |
84 | Troy A Kapphan | Mcleod, MT 59052 | $1,621 |
85 | Douglas Esp | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,541 |
86 | Terry Talkington | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,541 |
87 | Justin Tye Cumin | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,516 |
88 | Richard D Gibby | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,393 |
89 | Gary Todd | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,384 |
90 | James A Hanson | Shawmut, MT 59078 | $1,341 |
91 | Claude Joe Beley | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,288 |
92 | Gary W Burmeister | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,234 |
93 | Lynn Labrie | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,141 |
94 | Wade D Cumin | Rapelje, MT 59067 | $1,111 |
95 | Charles Weller | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $984 |
96 | Ken Gregorich | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $983 |
97 | Joseph Edward Leyo | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $876 |
98 | Raisland Revocable Trust | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $831 |
99 | Bridger Cunningham | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $797 |
100 | Tucker Cunningham | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $779 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”