Total Disaster Programs in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 392
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $9,245,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Thomas G Agnew | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $33,272 |
82 | Maurice Flanagan | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $33,261 |
83 | Raisland Revocable Trust | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $32,184 |
84 | Pitchfork Cattle LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $31,554 |
85 | Kenneth D Gilbert | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $31,310 |
86 | Jon Grosfield | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $31,070 |
87 | Paul L Gilbert Living Trust | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $30,697 |
88 | Roger Hammersmark | Mcleod, MT 59052 | $30,291 |
89 | David L Hathaway | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $30,180 |
90 | Paul A Becken | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $29,306 |
91 | Daniel John Tronrud | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $27,359 |
92 | Remi Metcalf | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $26,693 |
93 | Lee Roy Goddard | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $26,435 |
94 | Allen Laubach | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $25,953 |
95 | Alfred Anderson Jr | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $25,773 |
96 | Wm S Fraser | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $25,482 |
97 | Swamp Crk Angus Rch | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $25,397 |
98 | Stuart T Stenberg | Mc Leod, MT 59052 | $24,803 |
99 | Stephanie R Young | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $24,621 |
100 | , | $24,608 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”