Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 122
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $933,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Harv Vanwagoner | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $745 |
102 | Tyler Plaggemeyer | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $741 |
103 | Rebecca C Gregorich | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $703 |
104 | Stephanie R Young | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $702 |
105 | Jamie Goddard | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $679 |
106 | Jason Burkholder | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $678 |
107 | Marvin Laubach | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $623 |
108 | Ryland Daniel Groshens | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $605 |
109 | Jacob Stenberg | Mcleod, MT 59052 | $585 |
110 | Keith J Engle | Mc Leod, MT 59052 | $582 |
111 | Eob Ranch LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $523 |
112 | Cole T Cumin | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $509 |
113 | Marc A Scrivner | Columbus, MT 59019 | $457 |
114 | Kari Hanson | Park City, MT 59063 | $450 |
115 | Mary A Wheeler | Western Grove, AR 72685 | $429 |
116 | Marilyn Raisland | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $391 |
117 | Matt Kleinsasser | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $370 |
118 | Cort Strobel | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $336 |
119 | Greg Curry | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $267 |
120 | Nikolas Grosfield | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $222 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”