Direct Payment Program in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 131
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $901,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | E-z Gone Ranch | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $383 |
102 | Kelly S Titeca | Shawmut, MT 59078 | $381 |
103 | R Thomas Brownlee | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $369 |
104 | Olav S Stenberg | Mc Leod, MT 59052 | $337 |
105 | Paul E Hedrick Jr | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $264 |
106 | William Mayo | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $240 |
107 | John O Drivdahl | Denton, MT 59430 | $224 |
108 | Craig Greenlee | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $219 |
109 | Duane Mothershead | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $219 |
110 | Rick R Reed | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $214 |
111 | Lynn E Sanders | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $200 |
112 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $199 |
113 | Joshua Paul Hedrick | Billings, MT 59105 | $176 |
114 | Dr Dale Vermillion | Greycliff, MT 59033 | $170 |
115 | William R Lowe | Billings, MT 59102 | $166 |
116 | Lynn And Julie Sanders Revocable Family Trust | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $166 |
117 | Kenneth D. Laubach Estate | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $129 |
118 | Kenneth D Laubach | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $125 |
119 | Laubach Red Angus LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $114 |
120 | Darrel Laubach | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $111 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”