Farm Subsidy information
Sweet Grass County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 584
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $23,811,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Trees Partnership | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $198,265 |
22 | K Bar A Ranch | Melville, MT 59055 | $197,495 |
23 | 406 Rooney Ranch LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $194,575 |
24 | Cumin Ranches, LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $191,151 |
25 | Cole T Cumin | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $188,581 |
26 | Linda Mcmullen | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $182,678 |
27 | Ky Hanson | Shawmut, MT 59078 | $180,916 |
28 | Walter L Plaggemeyer | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $180,628 |
29 | Glenn R Berg | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $180,506 |
30 | Robert H Wilson | Townsend, MT 59644 | $161,096 |
31 | Hooks Ranch LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $160,420 |
32 | William T Brownlee | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $155,964 |
33 | Kenneth D Gilbert | Rapelje, MT 59067 | $149,470 |
34 | Green Cattle Co. LLC | Melville, MT 59055 | $149,258 |
35 | Stewart B Drange | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $148,988 |
36 | Lorents Grosfield | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $143,113 |
37 | Shirley J Breck | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $141,337 |
38 | Arneson Ranch Inc | Meadow, SD 57644 | $138,436 |
39 | Cross Triangle Ranch LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $136,589 |
40 | The Holman Revocable Trust | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $128,297 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”