Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 225
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $1,837,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Elwood Schwers | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $21,486 |
22 | Gary Goddard | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $21,353 |
23 | Green Ranch LLC | Melville, MT 59055 | $20,571 |
24 | Shirley J Breck | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $20,075 |
25 | Roger Indreland | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $19,623 |
26 | Marlyn Drange | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $19,520 |
27 | Kenneth D Laubach | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $18,818 |
28 | Richard M Swartz | Broadview, MT 59015 | $18,555 |
29 | Stimpson Inc | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $17,989 |
30 | David L Hathaway | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $17,400 |
31 | Crazy Mountain Cattle Co | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $17,292 |
32 | H W Burns Family LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $16,973 |
33 | Alfred Anderson Jr | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $16,792 |
34 | Maverick Cattle Co LLC | Billings, MT 59107 | $16,351 |
35 | Estate Of Sigrid Jarrett | Springdale, MT 59082 | $15,937 |
36 | Joel Schwers | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $14,270 |
37 | Gary Arlian | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $14,256 |
38 | David Breck | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $14,118 |
39 | Daniel John Tronrud | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $13,954 |
40 | Allen Laubach | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $13,800 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”