Total Commodity Programs in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 400
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $9,836,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Roger Dean Indreland | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $63,465 |
42 | Larry Plaggemeyer | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $62,480 |
43 | Rein Anchor Ranch Lllp | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $62,211 |
44 | The Holman Revocable Trust | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $58,633 |
45 | Gary Arlian | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $58,605 |
46 | Sweetgrass Management, Inc. | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $57,449 |
47 | Hailstone Ranch | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $57,421 |
48 | Arnold Tollefson | Fort Laramie, WY 82212 | $56,925 |
49 | Wm S Fraser | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $56,505 |
50 | Stewart B Drange | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $52,403 |
51 | Francis S Cosgriff | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $51,975 |
52 | David Breck | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $51,586 |
53 | 406 Rooney Ranch LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $50,811 |
54 | Hobble Diamond Land & Cattle LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $50,354 |
55 | Cumin Ranches, LLC | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $49,007 |
56 | William T Brownlee | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $48,628 |
57 | Wallace C Walker | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $47,987 |
58 | Brett Todd | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $44,743 |
59 | Engle Ranch Inc | Mc Leod, MT 59052 | $44,195 |
60 | Steven G Ott | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $43,561 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”