Wool and Mohair Programs in Teton County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 75
Recipients of Wool and Mohair Programs from farms in Teton County, Montana totaled $221,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wool and Mohair Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Richard P Christy | Fairfield, MT 59436 | $34,724 |
2 | Rockport Colony Inc | Pendroy, MT 59467 | $27,882 |
3 | Miller Colony Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $26,313 |
4 | Ira Perkins And Sons | Pendroy, MT 59467 | $23,880 |
5 | Ralston Gap Cattle Co | Choteau, MT 59422 | $17,605 |
6 | Harris V Hanging Lazy F Ranch | Fairfield, MT 59436 | $13,631 |
7 | Crumpled Horn Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $8,413 |
8 | James L Hadley | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $5,777 |
9 | Invalid Stott Ranch Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $4,885 |
10 | Steven Rose | Pendroy, MT 59467 | $4,098 |
11 | William H Miller | Choteau, MT 59422 | $4,094 |
12 | Terry Bliss | Fairfield, MT 59436 | $3,867 |
13 | Diane L Collins | Bynum, MT 59419 | $3,831 |
14 | Jerry Valdez | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $3,469 |
15 | Wayvan Campbell | Choteau, MT 59422 | $2,845 |
16 | Pollock Ranch Inc | Bynum, MT 59419 | $2,655 |
17 | John R Ostle | Bynum, MT 59419 | $2,618 |
18 | William A Leys Revocable Living T | Choteau, MT 59422 | $2,202 |
19 | William D Stott | Choteau, MT 59422 | $1,997 |
20 | Allen Hostetler | La Monte, MO 65337 | $1,930 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>