Total Commodity Programs in Teton County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 627
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Teton County, Montana totaled $12,347,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | J G Stoltz Inc | Pendroy, MT 59467 | $27,893 |
122 | B & L Farms | Power, MT 59468 | $27,879 |
123 | Golden West Farm Inc | Dutton, MT 59433 | $27,849 |
124 | Badger Hole Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $27,785 |
125 | Heavirland Enterprises | Choteau, MT 59422 | $27,681 |
126 | William P Briggs Jr | Conrad, MT 59425 | $27,651 |
127 | Odden Organics Inc | Dutton, MT 59433 | $27,327 |
128 | The Marta Corporation | Dutton, MT 59433 | $26,900 |
129 | Dustin Paddock | Fairfield, MT 59436 | $26,008 |
130 | Double Creek Farms Inc | Fairfield, MT 59436 | $25,972 |
131 | Headington Farms Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $25,772 |
132 | Mountain View Livestock Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $25,768 |
133 | Sevens Livestock Co | Choteau, MT 59422 | $25,484 |
134 | Daniel Lee Frazer | Choteau, MT 59422 | $25,417 |
135 | Ben A Neal | Choteau, MT 59422 | $25,299 |
136 | Rice Brothers LLC | Conrad, MT 59425 | $24,009 |
137 | Mark Mcinerney Farms LLC | Fairfield, MT 59436 | $23,969 |
138 | Donna A Gulick | Fairfield, MT 59436 | $23,448 |
139 | Timothy J Brunner Dba East Bench Cattle | Power, MT 59468 | $23,398 |
140 | Bradley D Hodgskiss | Choteau, MT 59422 | $23,029 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”