Farm Subsidy information
Teton County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Teton County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,410
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Teton County, Montana totaled $410,120,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Habel Commodities Inc | Dutton, MT 59433 | $1,688,777 |
22 | Tyler G Stephens | Augusta, MT 59410 | $1,627,761 |
23 | Joseph & Cathy Campbell | Choteau, MT 59422 | $1,626,861 |
24 | Rainbow Farms Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $1,591,755 |
25 | Headington Farms Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $1,580,511 |
26 | K-farms Inc | Fairfield, MT 59436 | $1,543,145 |
27 | Odden Farms | Dutton, MT 59433 | $1,525,113 |
28 | Nelson Homestead Farm | Conrad, MT 59425 | $1,478,213 |
29 | Schuler Bros | Carter, MT 59420 | $1,459,494 |
30 | David A Carlson | Choteau, MT 59422 | $1,451,344 |
31 | Scattered Acres Farms Inc | Power, MT 59468 | $1,449,137 |
32 | Deep Creek Grazing Assoc Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $1,421,925 |
33 | Black Leaf Farm Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $1,416,087 |
34 | Brad A Schaefer | Power, MT 59468 | $1,404,983 |
35 | Rocking K Land & Cattle | Fairfield, MT 59436 | $1,387,243 |
36 | Diamond Valley Farms Inc | Dutton, MT 59433 | $1,382,593 |
37 | Hemstad Farms Inc | Dutton, MT 59433 | $1,369,825 |
38 | Pfeifle Farms Inc | Power, MT 59468 | $1,359,456 |
39 | C & E Farms | Dutton, MT 59433 | $1,351,504 |
40 | R4m Blanchet | Dutton, MT 59433 | $1,309,901 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”