Farm Subsidy information
Teton County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Teton County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,466
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Teton County, Montana totaled $442,346,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | R4m Blanchet | Dutton, MT 59433 | $1,363,991 |
42 | Doheny Acres Inc | Dutton, MT 59433 | $1,339,874 |
43 | T & T Farms Inc | Dutton, MT 59433 | $1,332,110 |
44 | Charles D Stephens | Hot Springs, MT 59845 | $1,302,868 |
45 | Merle D Morris | Augusta, MT 59410 | $1,295,935 |
46 | Mcrae Inc | Dutton, MT 59433 | $1,288,372 |
47 | Ray Keller And Son | Brady, MT 59416 | $1,287,138 |
48 | J L B Farms | Dutton, MT 59433 | $1,284,938 |
49 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $1,276,211 |
50 | The Marta Corporation | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $1,264,510 |
51 | C Mark Fellows | Choteau, MT 59422 | $1,258,896 |
52 | Toney Dale Grossman | Power, MT 59468 | $1,223,707 |
53 | Nld Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $1,219,504 |
54 | Van Horn Ranch Co | Conrad, MT 59425 | $1,214,475 |
55 | Don Passmore Farms Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $1,207,652 |
56 | Inbody Farms Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $1,200,047 |
57 | Gen 5 Inc | Pendroy, MT 59467 | $1,191,184 |
58 | Charles Horak | Dutton, MT 59433 | $1,176,384 |
59 | Depner Farms Inc | Dutton, MT 59433 | $1,168,642 |
60 | Sam Luinstra And Sons Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $1,160,518 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”