Total Conservation Programs in Toole County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 159
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Toole County, Montana totaled $1,712,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Clarence Hart | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $21,338 |
22 | Marcy E Mclean | Great Falls, MT 59406 | $21,217 |
23 | Farmtek Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $20,342 |
24 | Thomas Hasquet | Shelby, MT 59474 | $19,704 |
25 | Terry Alme | Oilmont, MT 59466 | $19,658 |
26 | Connie Alme | Oilmont, MT 59466 | $19,658 |
27 | Bradley S Wigen Dba Brad Wigen Farms | Helena, MT 59602 | $19,499 |
28 | Carl E Clark | Shelby, MT 59474 | $19,039 |
29 | Torgerson Farms Partnership | Ethridge, MT 59435 | $18,440 |
30 | Dennis A Fitzpatrick Jr | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $18,302 |
31 | Greenhill Grain Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $18,244 |
32 | Cab Farms Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $18,204 |
33 | Lindberg Grain Inc | Conrad, MT 59425 | $17,566 |
34 | Steven C Fransen & Gale D Fransen Revocable Trust | Prosser, WA 99350 | $16,070 |
35 | Steen Alme Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $15,734 |
36 | Hellinger Brothers Corporation | Shelby, MT 59474 | $15,496 |
37 | Bussell Farms Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $15,495 |
38 | Sweetgrass Hills Ranch Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $15,324 |
39 | Robert P Hasquet Family Trust | Shelby, MT 59474 | $14,873 |
40 | John A Harwood | Joliet, MT 59041 | $14,324 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”