Total Commodity Programs in Toole County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,527
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Toole County, Montana totaled $177,999,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Torgerson Farms Partnership | Ethridge, MT 59435 | $3,345,949 |
2 | Camrose Colony Inc | Ledger, MT 59456 | $2,680,232 |
3 | Rimrock Colony Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $2,592,884 |
4 | Hillside Colony Inc | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $2,326,981 |
5 | Diamond R Partnership | Ledger, MT 59456 | $2,247,413 |
6 | Big Rose Colony Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $2,190,141 |
7 | M & M Farms | Shelby, MT 59474 | $2,008,410 |
8 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $2,007,205 |
9 | First State Bank Of Shelby ** | Shelby, MT 59474 | $1,791,917 |
10 | H-b Farms | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $1,785,733 |
11 | Leck Joint Venture | Galata, MT 59444 | $1,732,129 |
12 | Flesch Grain And Livestock | Shelby, MT 59474 | $1,712,497 |
13 | Wallewein Grain & Cattle Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $1,659,175 |
14 | Fretheim Grain | Shelby, MT 59474 | $1,498,865 |
15 | Welker Farms Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $1,410,111 |
16 | West End Farm Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $1,383,395 |
17 | Karo Farm Partnership | Ledger, MT 59456 | $1,323,024 |
18 | Tyler Mclean | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,254,549 |
19 | Fretheim Brothers | Shelby, MT 59474 | $1,226,193 |
20 | Larsen Production Inc | Galata, MT 59444 | $1,225,315 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>