Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Valley County, Montana, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 60

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Valley County, Montana totaled $881,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
41Ken WolffWolf Point, MT 59201$5,227
42Joseph E ReylingGlasgow, MT 59230$5,088
43Gina M Nelson ReylingGlasgow, MT 59230$5,087
44Morris V Tattoo JrWolf Point, MT 59201$4,835
45Silver Dollar Grazing AssnGlasgow, MT 59230$4,644
46Fort Peck Tribal Farm & RanchPoplar, MT 59255$4,635
47Brian FuhrmanOpheim, MT 59250$4,570
48Richard L FultonRichland, MT 59260$4,437
49Darlene FultonRichland, MT 59260$4,263
50Maureen E CarsonNashua, MT 59248$3,594
51Deneen FuhrmanOpheim, MT 59250$3,592
52Unrau Ranch IncWolf Point, MT 59201$3,017
53Doral FjellNashua, MT 59248$1,736
54Victor J DonovanLaurel, MT 59044$816
55Kelly DonovanBillings, MT 59106$816
56Debra DonovanBillings, MT 59106$591
57Rita DonovanLaurel, MT 59044$590
58Roy A JonesHinsdale, MT 59241$225
59Frank Jones IIIHinsdale, MT 59241$225
60Marvin J & Deborah L Tarum J VFort Peck, MT 59223$75

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag